Saudi Arabia is facing questions over its decision to stop issuing public warnings of imminent attacks before a series of deadly strikes hit Riyadh's international airport, killing at least 18 people and injuring more than 300.
The Saudi government has not explained why public alerts were absent before four attacks on the airport over the past week. The warnings had previously informed residents about security threats linked to the Kingdom's conflict with Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthi movement.
Four Western and Arab officials in the region, along with political analysts, told Reuters that the absence of warnings raised concerns about Saudi Arabia's vulnerability to attacks and its ability to protect residents and visitors. They also suggested the decision reflected an effort to preserve a sense of normality despite the security situation.
Sultan Alamer, a US-based Saudi academic and senior resident fellow at the Middle East Policy Council, said the government appeared to be balancing military action with efforts to reassure the public and international stakeholders.
Saudi Civil Defence, which operates under the Interior Ministry and manages emergency alerts, did not respond to emailed questions about the lack of warnings. The government media office also did not respond to requests for comment.
On Monday, Civil Defence issued its first public threat alerts since September 29, warning of potential dangers in Riyadh and cities in southern Saudi Arabia. Reuters said it could not establish whether the renewed alerts were directly linked to the airport attacks.
Early Warning System Falls Silent
Gulf countries have faced Iranian missile and drone attacks since the US-Iran war began in February, but their approaches to public warnings have differed.
Qatar's Interior Ministry has issued mobile phone alerts before nearly every attack, including incidents in July when residents were instructed to remain indoors and stay away from windows. Bahrain and Kuwait have also repeatedly sounded sirens urging people to seek shelter.
Saudi Arabia introduced a national early warning system in May, distributing threat alerts through mobile phones and social media. However, the system stopped issuing public threat warnings despite a rise in Houthi attacks before last week's airport strikes.
According to posts on the Civil Defence account on X, the last alert before the recent attacks was issued on September 29 for the southern province of Najran.
Authorities continued issuing warnings about dangerous weather, including heavy rain and flooding, during the period without military threat alerts. Civil Defence also reminded residents not to circulate images, rumours or information about missile interceptions and impact locations. The restrictions are covered by government regulations introduced in March.
Reuters could not establish whether anyone had been prosecuted for sharing such information. Saudi authorities did not respond to requests for comment.
Two officials with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters that representatives of an allied Western government had asked Saudi authorities why public alerts had stopped before the airport attacks. According to the officials, the response was that the alerts caused disruption and that many residents had complained about being woken during the night.
Saudi officials did not respond to requests for comment on that account.
Michael Ratney, a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, said the government was attempting to respond to security threats without causing widespread disruption. However, he argued that the absence of warnings had increased public anxiety rather than reduced it.
Analysts Question Saudi Arabia's Air Defence Capacity
Ali Shihabi, a Saudi analyst close to the government, said the country's vast territory made it difficult to protect every strategic location against aerial attacks.
He pointed to the scale of Saudi Arabia's infrastructure, including airports, pipelines and oil facilities, and said available missile defence systems and interceptors could not provide comprehensive protection across the entire country at once.
Shihabi argued that Saudi Arabia faced a continuing need for additional air defence capabilities.
Despite the attacks, Riyadh hosted an international energy conference on Monday, although several major oil executives withdrew from the event.
Speaking at the World Petroleum Council Energy Congress, Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, a brother of the Saudi crown prince, defended the Kingdom's ability to continue its economic plans while acknowledging the ongoing risks.
He thanked international delegates for travelling to Riyadh and said they understood that the country was safe, while also cautioning that the gathering did not mean the danger had passed.
The minister reaffirmed the Kingdom's commitment to its long-term vision and development objectives.
Western Embassies Issue Internal Security Alerts
Although Saudi Arabia had not issued public military threat alerts during much of the period, Riyadh reportedly came under attack approximately a dozen times, two Western officials told Reuters.
Western embassies in the Kingdom continued sending internal warnings about potential missile and drone threats to their staff, according to three people familiar with the matter and alerts reviewed by Reuters.
One source said the warnings drew on intelligence from the United States and other Western governments, alongside information provided by Saudi authorities.
Embassy staff received internal alerts around the time of two earlier airport strikes, the sources said. However, they said no internal warning had been received before Saturday's attack, the deadliest of the recent incidents. Reuters could not determine why the warning was absent.
Saudi state television released footage of Saturday's strike on Sunday. The images showed passengers waiting inside the airport terminal, with travellers queuing to board a flight and others sitting in chairs while looking at their mobile phones.
The footage then showed a bright orange flash from an explosion, illustrating the attack's impact on a civilian airport environment.
The absence of public warnings before the strikes has intensified questions about Saudi Arabia's approach to communicating security threats, protecting civilians and maintaining public confidence during the continuing conflict.
Source: Reuters News